Race decides who belongs
White means
“native.”
The job was front of house at a Brewers Fayre pub restaurant in Grays, at £11.49 an hour. The advert welcomed applications from under-represented groups: women, ethnic minorities, disabled people, members of the LGBTQ+ community. Robinson called it “an attack on white people” and demanded that DEI “must be demolished.”
For Robinson, “native” means white: “DEI is a strategy of making the native population a minority. Call it replacement.”
A Black Briton born in Grays is, in that vocabulary, not native. Even a pub’s recruitment advert becomes a plot to replace white Britain.
“Call it
replacement.”
The demand to remove them
Even
their children.
Remigration is the far right’s word for forced removal: of immigrants, refugees and their descendants, legal residents and citizens included, on the basis of race or of being seen as non-white. The term was revived in the 2010s by the Austrian activist Martin Sellner, a former member of a neo-Nazi group who has admitted putting a swastika sticker on a synagogue.
Robinson has made it his programme. In September 2025 he led around 150,000 people through central London behind a Remigration Now banner. His demand to “claim it back” for “the natives” extends to “invaders and their offspring”: “Remigration and de-islamisation.”
A British birthplace offers no exemption. The demand follows the bloodline.
The Truth About Remigration, two-page fact sheet (PDF)Citizens as well as migrants.Global Project Against Hate and Extremism, 2026Read the fact sheet
GazaPassage
“A clean sweep
of civilians.”
GazaPassage calls the removal of civilians “voluntary relocation.” Its founder, Weinhaus, styles himself “International Envoy.” When Trump proposed moving Gaza’s population out of Gaza, spokesman Christopher Bedell offered the organisation’s peculiar definition of neutrality: “We are apolitical. That hasn’t changed just because President Trump has validated our work.” Weinhaus and John Spencer of the Urban Warfare Institute supplied the military rationale in American Greatness on 12 February 2025.
It has three parts, named for Melville, MacArthur and mice. First, the civilian population, “the cloak shielding Hamas,” is moved out: “Trump’s clean sweep of civilians out of Gaza renders Hamas exposed and vulnerable.” Second, the territory is bypassed and starved of its people; where Japan “required atomic force on its civilian population en masse to be subdued,” Gaza is to be emptied and Hamas left in “a barren, exposed wasteland.” Third, “Mice: Hunting the Remnants.” The remnants are the civilians who stay: “Upon evacuation, many civilians will not leave, either out of loyalty to Hamas, fear, or sheer obstinance.” Israel, “standard-setting” in its “care for civilians,” has lacked “the strategic ability to do what America was willing to do in World War II in Japan—achieve surrender.” So the final phase goes through their houses: “a house-to-house cleansing operation” in which operatives are “rooted out and eliminated—much like a cat hunting mice.” Whether the relocation is temporary or permanent is “a feature, not a bug.”
“Mice: Hunting the Remnants.”
“Upon evacuation, many civilians will not leave, either out of loyalty to Hamas, fear, or sheer obstinance.”
By March, Weinhaus was taking credit: Trump’s policy had “taken our exact position.” “Basically, I only interfered with their military conduct by seeking to improve it.” Before GazaPassage’s next move, he would consult “not just you and Isaac, but Adam, Pat, and Antonio too.”
Remigration is the removal of a population by ancestry: ethnic cleansing. The plan Weinhaus endorses for Gaza is the removal of a population, with hunters sent through the houses of whoever stays; his word for it is cleansing. Robinson’s cheerleader wrote it. Valiente sits on the working group he proposed to consult.
Antonio Valiente & Edward Weinhaus
Signed,
and signed again.
A corporate lawyer based in San Juan, Puerto Rico, Antonio Ernesto Valiente-Rivera has held senior legal roles at Walmart and Athena Bitcoin Global. He is also admitted to the federal court for the Northern District of Illinois, where Weinhaus takes his grievances against judges to still more judges.
Valiente signed Weinhaus’s amended federal complaint against Judge Regina Scannicchio and the Illinois Judges Association in July 2024 and represented him in the Seventh Circuit the following year. The court affirmed the dismissal.
“I want to thank my attorney,
Antonio Valiente.”
By September 2026, Valiente was back with another federal complaint against another judge—Jill Rose Quinn—with Weinhaus again among the plaintiffs.
At GazaPassage, they sit on the same working group. Weinhaus named Antonio among the advisers he would consult about what the organisation should do next.
His attorney.
Represented Weinhaus against Judge Scannicchio, pursued the appeal and filed the later case against Judge Quinn.
September 2026 docketHis fellow adviser.
Serves alongside Weinhaus on the working group and is one of the advisers Weinhaus said he would consult on the organisation’s next direction.
Working-group roster March 2025 interviewThe admirer
has an ally.
Robinson turned a grandfather’s afternoon in the park into a family’s fear of leaving home.
Weinhaus calls standing by Robinson patriotism.
Valiente has made himself useful on both fronts: pursuing Weinhaus’s lawsuits against judges and serving alongside him at GazaPassage.